Personally, I would say that speaking for the majority I am absolutely sure we are going to address that issue, and I am confident that when we get to title II, the gentleman and others will raise that issue, and we look forward to that debate on judicial review. This is probably not the time for it. But let me say also, to make it very clear, that judicial review is of the agency requirement here. It is a very limited requirement. It is for regulations after enactment of the legislation, over $100 million, and it asks for a written statement on costs and benefits.
Rob Portman: “Personally, I would say that speaking for the majority I am absolutely sure we are going to address that issue, and I am…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the topic of judicial review during a legislative debate.
Share
More from Rob Portman
We have got to get back to a system where we are serving the people, and that means agreeing on that objective.
we have talked about more important legislative measures, and I just want to say thank you to all of my colleagues and to my colleague from Illinois who spoke and to the others who were overly generous in their comments. I appreciate it. I…
We recommend that to help reverse bird declines the Joint Ventures be allocated $20 million.
I come to the floor for the 28th consecutive week since the Senate has been in session to once again discuss the war in Ukraine and why it is so important that all of us-- the United States and our allies--stand up for Ukraine at this…





