I would also say that if you look at the budget rules when we are talking about taxes, this is just a carve-out for taxes, it just has to do with situations where you have a net decrease in taxes in a tax package. Right now, we are living under rules that I think, despite what the gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. Moakley) may believe about those rules, we are going to continue to have to live under, which say that every time you want to give tax relief, you have to mandate. It seems to me, again, it would be absurd, then, to require those mandates to be subject to this if we are requiring ourselves to mandate.
Rob Portman: “I would also say that if you look at the budget rules when we are talking about taxes, this is just a carve-out for…”
On the recordMay 19, 1998
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing budget rules related to tax relief during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Rob Portman
Nov 29, 2025
Instead, this administration allowed a lack of effective screening of Afghan evacuees to endanger our communities and is now seeking to fast track their citizenship through the upcoming appropriations process.
Oct 24, 2023
We recommend that to help reverse bird declines the Joint Ventures be allocated $20 million.
Oct 23, 2023
We recommend that to help reverse bird declines the Joint Ventures be allocated $20 million.
Dec 8, 2022
OK. Done. So to my colleagues, I have worked with every one of you in one way or another. Thank you for that privilege, and Godspeed as you continue to serve your constituents and continue to carry that torch of freedom forward. Thank you…





