Let me outline briefly what is in the legislation with regard to the balance that the gentleman from Minnesota [Mr. Vento] referred to. It is simply unfair to say that the benefits are not to be considered; in fact, they are required to be considered. To repeat, section 423 requires the committees to perform a cost-benefit analysis. Section 421(7)(c) requires CBO again to calculate not only the cost but also the net savings. Any cost analysis, including cost analysis of the threshold, has to be net savings to the local government. Section 202 says agencies must perform a cost-benefit analysis. I would also say that all the examples listed by my colleague, the gentleman from California [Mr. Farr], are those under existing mandates and none of those are covered by this bill.
Rob Portman: “Let me outline briefly what is in the legislation with regard to the balance that the gentleman from Minnesota [Mr.…”
On the recordFebruary 1, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the requirements for cost-benefit analysis in proposed legislation.
Share
More from Rob Portman
Nov 2, 2022
This is not the time for us to back off. In fact, it's a time for us to redouble our efforts because the Ukrainians have shown through their bravery, their courage on the battlefield, that they are making progress, have made tremendous…
Nov 29, 2025
As I have said repeatedly, I support the resettlement of Afghans who stood in battle with us and our allies over the last 20 years but... the United States faces an increased threat due to this administration’s catastrophic evacuation of…
Oct 24, 2023
We recommend that to help reverse bird declines the Joint Ventures be allocated $20 million.





