This is a rather unusual amendment offered by the gentleman from Vermont. It is unusual because by its own terms it says the IRS shall not use the funds appropriated to it under this bill to violate specific provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, ERISA and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. I hope this is unnecessary. Under current law, the Internal Revenue Service is required to interpret and enforce the law and is prohibited from acting in contravention of the law. It is also unusual in that we are in the appropriation process and this addresses tax policy. I do not see any particular harm in the amendment, I just think it is a little unusual.
Rob Portman: “This is a rather unusual amendment offered by the gentleman from Vermont. It is unusual because by its own terms it says…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an unusual amendment related to IRS funding and tax policy during a floor debate.
Share
More from Rob Portman
Instead, this administration allowed a lack of effective screening of Afghan evacuees to endanger our communities and is now seeking to fast track their citizenship through the upcoming appropriations process.
We have got to get back to a system where we are serving the people, and that means agreeing on that objective.
That is what we have lost, that art, the art of the deal that was talked about earlier.
As I have said repeatedly, I support the resettlement of Afghans who stood in battle with us and our allies over the last 20 years but... the United States faces an increased threat due to this administration’s catastrophic evacuation of…





