I want to say briefly, because there has been some confusion in some of the discussion, that a ``no'' vote is the right vote if Members do not want to impose additional mandates on State and local government. There are also huge private sector mandates here which were required to be analyzed by the Unfunded Mandates Relief Act, but a ``no'' vote is the correct vote if Members do not want to impose these additional mandates. In closing, I would just say that this is exactly the kind of debate we hoped to have with the Unfunded Mandates Relief Act. We now have it out in the open. This is an unfunded mandate on State and local government. If Members do not want to impose those mandates, they now have the opportunity to stand up and be counted.
Rob Portman: “I want to say briefly, because there has been some confusion in some of the discussion, that a ``no'' vote is the right…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of voting on mandates affecting state and local governments.
Share
More from Rob Portman
We think that all data collected relating to Americans and then accessed in China is a problem.
12 years ago, I stood on this Senate floor for my maiden speech. I was new to the Senate, but I had a sense of what I thought was possible to achieve for my constituents in Ohio, having served in the House for 12 years and in two…
This is not the time for us to back off. In fact, it's a time for us to redouble our efforts because the Ukrainians have shown through their bravery, their courage on the battlefield, that they are making progress, have made tremendous…
I come to the floor for the 27th consecutive week since the invasion of Ukraine to give another update to the American people on the brutal, illegal, and totally unprovoked attack by Russia on its neighbor Ukraine. This is at a time when…





