Rob Portman: “No. It is not. What this bill does is it looks prospectively. It looks…”

On the recordFebruary 1, 1995

No. It is not. What this bill does is it looks prospectively. It looks to the future.

Said by

Republican · Ohio

Source

Discussing the implications of a bill during a floor debate.

More from Rob Portman

Oct 18, 2023

I think you look historically, that has been the case.

Oct 24, 2023

We recommend that to help reverse bird declines the Joint Ventures be allocated $20 million.

Sep 27, 2022

These are actually definitions of genocide.

Oct 24, 2023

We recommend that to help reverse bird declines the Joint Ventures be allocated $20 million.

Other voices in this conversation

Rob Portman: “No. It is not. What this bill does is it looks prospectively. It looks to the future.”