But usually I think and the American people think of the word ``assurance'' being something you give your friends and allies. And, in this instance, this is an assurance that the administration is giving to a nation that would be an attacker to our Nation, someone who is attacking us. That's not the circumstance of what I would think of assurance.
Speaker addresses concerns about the administration's use of the term 'assurance' in foreign policy.
Share
More from Mike Turner
How do you let someone vote and not even have an identification? I can't understand how anyone would be opposed to that.
This bill would be an important symbolism to say 'we're going to be with Ukraine.'
You can't have – you can't be America first and pro-Russia, because Russia has – is a self-declared adversary of the United States.
I think also that that's true, even as the administration is looking to its review, both in Europe, the conflict in Iran, the issues with Ukraine, across the board, both the House and the Senate have registered that the Pentagon needs to…
Other voices in this conversation
