On the recordJune 10, 2010
Well, I appreciate my good friend Mr. Miller's statement. There is one that I do want to correct, though, which is that all of Ohio would be under his suggested limit of 415. We certainly could have picked a lower number. My community is at 271. The issue becomes one of, well, we're in a financial crisis, and we're having bailouts and mortgage foreclosures across the country. We look to this issue as one of basic math. The larger the loan amount, the more the risk. When there is fluctuation in the market, a percentage of a larger number is a larger loss, leading to, certainly, an issue of more increased incidences of a likelihood of foreclosure. Also, the issue of larger loan amounts means fewer loans which could be provided assistance. There is a limited amount here, and with that limited amount, if it is carved up into $750,000 home sales versus those that are going to more moderately priced homes, you certainly will have less resources with which to provide that assistance. This is basic math. When we look across the country during this mortgage foreclosure crisis, we have to be very concerned about how we ensure that we are assisting home buyers, low and moderate buyers. At the same time, we have to ensure we are not overly inflating the market and that we are not putting the taxpayers at greater risk. I reserve the balance of my time.





