Political Quotes

On the recordJuly 23, 2013
This amendment would restrict President Obama from unlawfully divesting our Nation's strategic delivery systems. Since the enactment of the New START Treaty in 2010, the President has continued to jeopardize the security of the United States by unilaterally pursuing policies and international agreements that call for the drastic reduction of our Nation's nuclear deterrent. Not only are these proposed policies and agreements harmful to the United States, but also they are in violation of standing laws such as the Arms Control and Disarmament Act, which states that international agreements cannot limit or reduce the military forces of the United States unless enacted pursuant to a treaty or congressional-executive agreement. {time} 0045 It is unfortunate that amendments such as this one have become necessary, as the President chooses to ignore the role of Congress when negotiating arms reductions. As recently as last month, President Obama delivered a speech in Berlin in which he outlined his plan to further reduce nuclear warheads by as much as one-third. Since that time, the administration has given no indication that he would seek to negotiate or seek Senate ratification of a formal treaty as required by law. Instead, the administration continues to engage directly with the Russian Federation while averting a formal treaty process in coordination with the Senate.…
Said by
Mike Turner
Republican · Ohio
Source
govinfo.gov
Jul 23, 2013

Share

More from Mike Turner

Aug 3, 2026

I think also that that's true, even as the administration is looking to its review, both in Europe, the conflict in Iran, the issues with Ukraine, across the board, both the House and the Senate have registered that the Pentagon needs to…

cbsnews.com
Jul 12, 2026

This bill would be an important symbolism to say 'we're going to be with Ukraine.'

cbsnews.com
Nov 30, 2025

Obviously, if that occurred, that would be very serious and I agree that that would be an illegal act

apnews.com

Other voices in this conversation