That is exactly right. It is the good faith exclusion. What it says is that we are going to discipline the police officer, teach that person how to do it right. But if it was done in good faith and it did not impair the criminal's rights, then we are going to allow that evidence to be admitted. That is an important thing because that swings the pendulum back to punish criminals and to be on the side of victims.
Discussing the good faith exclusion in relation to police conduct and evidence admission.
Share
More from Martin Hoke
As the Ethics Committee prepares its recommendations to the full House, it should release only the information which the committee agrees is relevant and necessary to support its findings. To ask a Member, any Member, to also respond in…
you know the one thing, or one of the things, that a representative democracy cannot tolerate is the poison of disinformation and deceit and demagoguery. And it is a solitary, singular and extraordinarily disturbing time when it is…
First of all, we reduce from $5,000 to $2,500 per election the amount of money that a political action committee can give to a candidate. The previous speaker from Connecticut suggests that this means that working people and less affluent…
I looked at this survey that has been completed by HHS about drug use among teenagers. I do not get it. I am confused about why. Here we have got overall drug use that has doubled in the last 4 years. Remember that after there was a…
Other voices in this conversation
