To be a little bit more serious, it seems to me that there is a question about this particular bill and the rule and whether what we have seen here tonight is a reflection of a systemic problem in the House with respect to the appropriations process or if what we are dealing with is a problem with respect to this specific bill. I have some strong feelings about that, that this in fact reflects a systemic problem in the whole appropriations process in the way that we spend money, the taxpayers' money. But maybe it is just about this bill. What are your thoughts?
Martin Hoke: “To be a little bit more serious, it seems to me that there is a question about this particular bill and the rule and…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about the appropriations process during House debate.
Share
More from Martin Hoke
Just like a private citizen, just like you and I, just like somebody in the private sector. You are not going to be stuck in a 1965 plan and not have any other options or places to go.
I will tell him why I will not. Because that particular piece of legislation gives another $500 billion of additional extension on the debt ceiling, a half a trillion dollars. I think that is absolutely dead wrong. It is the kind of…
I would like to say just very, very briefly that what this does is essentially it is a ``Buy American'' amendment that applies to landing gear with certain exceptions and its makes it clear that the landing gear that will go on our…
Simply said, no Member of Congress should vote for $270 billion in Medicare cuts believing that reductions of this size have been recommended by the Medicare trustees or that such reductions are needed now to prevent an imminent funding…





