Mr. Speaker, it is hard not to be somewhat amused by the shenanigans that are going on on the floor right now when we are being told that we are completely shackling the rights of the minority by not allowing them to have the central reform that should be in this rules package; that is, the gift and lobby reform. It has to be pointed out that for 40 years Democrats have had the opportunity to pass this fundamental gift and lobby reform, and yet they have not been able to do it in a timely way that got through both the House and the Senate and was signed into law. For them now to claim that somehow, somehow this is preventing them from doing this when they know substantively we will get to this later, the question I have is why did they choose the gift and lobby reform as opposed to fundamental campaign finance reform, that is the elimination of special interest contributions, They know and I know that about $250,000 plus goes into every single incumbent's campaign on a cyclical basis. That is real influence that is being purchased by special interest groups, and yet there is only one group, one group in the entire Congress, not the House Republicans, not the Senate Democrats, not the Senate Republicans that do not want to limit that genuine purchasing of influence, and that group is the House Democrats.
Martin Hoke: “Mr. Speaker, it is hard not to be somewhat amused by the shenanigans that are going on on the floor right now when we…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the lack of progress on gift and lobby reform in Congress.
Share
More from Martin Hoke
for the past 8 months liberal interest groups have been advertising in my district, and we have heard a drum beat of the same message here in the Congress from the minority, where millions of dollars have been spent trying to scare seniors…
I happen to have the privilege of living in what is known as the frost belt where one of these research planes does deicing research in northeastern Ohio. Somehow, somebody missed the point about sending deicing research aircraft to the…
I would like to say just very, very briefly that what this does is essentially it is a ``Buy American'' amendment that applies to landing gear with certain exceptions and its makes it clear that the landing gear that will go on our…
I am going to vote for it. But I have to say that it is with some great reluctance, particularly with respect to the ABM section of the bill. Let me read first of all what the President said in his message. This is his veto message: First…





