Mr. Chairman, we enter into another chapter of the ongoing struggle in Washington to define our view of how the Federal Government ought to operate. I want to kind of go back to the beginning of the book and start at the beginning and move up to where we are today. You might recall that last February, the President came to Capitol Hill and stood in the well and he said, ``I did promise you a tax cut, but now we are going to have tax increases, and I would like you to be patriotic.'' He turned to the Republicans and said, ``If you do not like my tax increases, give me your specifics.'' So the Republicans did give the President their specifics in terms of reducing the deficit by even more than what the President reduced the deficit by, without one dime of tax increase. That document was praised by a number of publications across this country, from liberal to conservative, for its intellectual honesty and its effort to reduce government. We were rejected in that effort to show the American people how we would eliminate the tax increases and substitute instead the changes in the operation of the Federal Government to achieve significant deficit reduction, more than what the President achieved, but without taxes.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing tax policy and deficit reduction during a House committee meeting.
Share
More from John Kasich
Joe Biden is a man for our times, times that call for all of us to take off our partisan hats and put our nation first for ourselves and of course for our children.
America is at a crossroads. Sometimes elections represent a real choice, a choice we make as individuals and as a nation about which path we want to take.
I mean, a lot of them if you take Youngstown for example, you know, they voted strong for Trump. Trump's not there, I'm not sure they turn out for Republicans.
Let me just say one other thing, and that is, look, if there is anything this country needs, its leadership and its leadership across many different sectors of how our country works, whether it is business or sports, but in politics, this…





