As the gentlewoman said, this amendment would require the Office of Government Ethics to promulgate rules to apply ethics laws to unpaid employees of the Executive Office and President of the White House. As she also mentioned, this is clearly to go after Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump. It seems to me that this is not the kind of thing that we should be focused on. Miss Trump has been appointed as an executive branch employee and is now covered by the ethics laws and regulations that apply to all executive branch employees. It seems to me this is congressional overreach and redundant of current ethics rules and practices of other folks who have worked in the executive branch. As I said, I oppose the amendment, and I reserve the balance of my time.
Jim Jordan: “As the gentlewoman said, this amendment would require the Office of Government Ethics to promulgate rules to apply…”
Share
More from Jim Jordan
That’s always been the case with Democrats; it’s all about maintaining power, they will take any crazy position as long as it furthers their ability to win elections and get power, and frankly to go against anyone who goes against…
These are difficult times that they’re going through, we understand that, these kind of situations always are, but Max is a good member and colleague and hopefully he’s gonna win reelection.
This action confirms that the platform's fraud prevention measures were not as robust as [ActBlue CEO Regina Wallace-Jones] told Congress. We will continue to demand answers.
We want to make sure that if you ever, God forbid, get another Joe Biden-type president who's just going to open the border, that makes it much tougher for him to do what he did.





