The Supreme Court has taken a dim view of statutes aimed primarily at eliminating disparate impacts that don't themselves violate the Fourteenth Amendment.
Jim Jordan: “The Supreme Court has taken a dim view of statutes aimed primarily at eliminating disparate impacts that don't…”
Editor's note · Context
Critique of H.R. 4's approach to voting rights.
Share
More from Jim Jordan
These are difficult times that they’re going through, we understand that, these kind of situations always are, but Max is a good member and colleague and hopefully he’s gonna win reelection.
That’s always been the case with Democrats; it’s all about maintaining power, they will take any crazy position as long as it furthers their ability to win elections and get power, and frankly to go against anyone who goes against…
If we have to, we'll use subpoenas to get the documents that we think they may not be giving us.
We want to make sure that if you ever, God forbid, get another Joe Biden-type president who's just going to open the border, that makes it much tougher for him to do what he did.





