You know why it was rejected? Because it is the same old game. It is exactly the same old game. The cuts come in the outyears; the tax increases come now. And, oh, here we go again. And, yes, there are no specifics to it. It is the same old game. I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Roskam).
Share & report
More from Jim Jordan
I would urge a ``no'' vote based on arguments we have made on the floor today. I think this is--I just urge a ``no'' vote. I think this is the wrong way to go. Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, further proceedings on this question are postponed. =========================== NOTE ===========================…
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to section 3(s) of House Resolution 8, the yeas and nays are ordered. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 234, nays 193, not voting 3, as…
I would say, if this bill was so important-- we have had over 20 markups in the Judiciary Committee--why didn't this bill come up? We have had markups in the last 2 days on one occasion, so I don't know why this bill didn't come up. Mr…
Other voices in this conversation
