I will respond to the gentlewoman from California. I appreciate the fact that she is a ``no'' on this bill, but I think her logic is all wrong. This bill would actually give $140 million to the DOJ so they can continue to do what they are already doing, work with Big Tech to censor certain information from getting to we the people. Why do I say that? Because we know it happened. Just a month ago, Mark Zuckerberg said the FBI came and told him not to allow the story about Hunter Biden's laptop to be on their platform. They gave him the old wink-wink, oh, we think this is Russian disinformation, which we know it wasn't. Now, we are going to give that agency $140 million more to go collude with Big Tech to keep we the people from getting valuable information before the most important election that we have, the election of the Commander in Chief of our country? That is why this thing is so scary and why we should be against it. Mr. Speaker, I yield 4 minutes to the gentleman from Louisiana (Mr. Johnson).
Share & report
More from Jim Jordan
I would point out, we are not trying to hide behind the Second Amendment--we are trying to defend it. We are defending it. It is an important part of our Bill of Rights, an important part of our Constitution. Madam Speaker, I yield 4…
Here is the fact. This bill is unconstitutional. The Supreme Court made clear the Second Amendment protects firearms in common use. This bill has eight pages of weapons and firearms that it bans, including 24 million firearms that law…
I have no idea what my distinguished colleague and chairman of the committee was referring to there, but I yield myself the balance of my time for the purpose of closing. Mr. Speaker, I would just add this: One of the phrases we heard from…
The Active Shooter Alert Act is unnecessary. It gives more authority to the Biden Justice Department, the most political Justice Department in history. States already utilize emergency alert systems to warn the public about natural and…





