When a Member of Congress says abolish ICE, when another Member of Congress says abolish DHS, when the Speaker of the House says walls are immoral, when the person who gave the State of the Union response to the President's State of the Union says she's okay with noncitizens voting, that all has an impact, doesn't it, just like the law that you're sworn to uphold and impact and do, when you're the Director of ICE?
Editor's note · Context
Jordan emphasizes the impact of congressional statements on immigration policy.
Share
More from Jim Jordan
We are more concerned frankly as Americans about the limits the DSA (Digital Services Act) and the Online Safety Act in the UK put on Americans’ First Amendment rights.
If we got the votes, let's go, but I don't think we do, so let's go to conference, iron it out — that's how the process works.
We absolutely need to protect children and keep harmful, illegal content off these platforms — but when governments or bureaucracies suppress speech in the name of safety or regulation, it sets a dangerous precedent that threatens the core…
That’s always been the case with Democrats; it’s all about maintaining power, they will take any crazy position as long as it furthers their ability to win elections and get power, and frankly to go against anyone who goes against…





