On that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, further proceedings on this question are postponed. =========================== NOTE =========================== July 19, 2022, on page H6728, in the second column, the following appeared: The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to section 3(s) of House Resolution 8, the yeas and nays are ordered. Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, further proceedings on this question are postponed. The online version has been corrected to read: The yeas and nays were ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, further proceedings on this question are postponed. ========================= END NOTE ========================= ____________________
Share & report
More from Jim Jordan
As I said at the outset and the gentleman from Louisiana (Mr. Johnson) and the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Roy) have said, we think this legislation is unnecessary. Justice Alito was very clear--again, it has been read several times-- the…
It requires the Department of Justice to issue a report. Seeing how the Department of Justice is already doing what is authorized in this bill, it would be kind of nice, frankly, to have this report done before we spend an additional $59…
I will respond to the gentlewoman from California. I appreciate the fact that she is a ``no'' on this bill, but I think her logic is all wrong. This bill would actually give $140 million to the DOJ so they can continue to do what they are…
I would say, if this bill was so important-- we have had over 20 markups in the Judiciary Committee--why didn't this bill come up? We have had markups in the last 2 days on one occasion, so I don't know why this bill didn't come up. Mr…





