Whether she ever had a conversation with her husband about her activities or not, that shouldn’t be the standard for when a judge makes a decision that he should recuse.
Editor's note · Context
Joyce Vance argues that Justice Clarence Thomas should recuse himself from cases related to elections due to his wife's beliefs about election fraud.
Share & report
More from J.D. Vance
Can I say with 100% certainty that it's going to work? No, but you don't do difficult things by only doing what's 100% certain. You do difficult things by trying.
Why don’t the Democrats just stop this entire charade and reopen the government so that we don’t have to try to make this thing work on a shoestring budget.
It’s not the end. It is, in fact, exactly how this is going to have to happen when you have people who hate each other.
I believe in the Christian gospel, and I hope eventually my wife comes to see it the same way. But if she doesn't, then God says everybody has free will. And so, that doesn't cause a problem for me.





