we have a saying in Ohio, especially north of Route 40, that you cannot make a silk purse out of a sow's ear. We are talking about a Medicare Part A surplus, and to not also recognize that we have a Part B Medicare responsibility and argue that we have a surplus when the figures show that when we put A and B together they are in deficit some $52 billion--there is no such thing as a Medicare surplus, if you are looking at Medicare as it really is, and that is Part A and Part B. In this budget, we are going to have about $36 billion more than what we expected in Part A, but on Part B--that is the out of hospital--we are going to be in deficit some $88 billion. When we put the two of them together, we are in deficit $52 billion. How can one talk about a Medicare surplus when we are in debt $52 billion? If we take the next 10 years, we are going to take in $393 billion more in Part A, but in Part B we are going to have to subsidize $1.36 trillion, and it all works out to be a deficit of $643 billion. The point I am making is this: There is no Medicare surplus; it is a fiction.
George Voinovich: “we have a saying in Ohio, especially north of Route 40, that you cannot make a silk purse out of a sow's ear. We are…”
On the recordJuly 10, 2001
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the realities of Medicare funding and the concept of a Medicare surplus.
Share
More from George Voinovich
Dec 13, 2010
since I joined the Senate almost 12 years ago, I have worked to ensure that Congress deals with our country's unsustainable national debt and budgets that are not balanced as far as the eye can see; to do this, we must undertake tax…
Nov 14, 2010
It is an American tragedy, in my view. And I am sure it is not consistent with the intent of Congress.
Dec 21, 2010
in my opinion, the jury has returned its verdict, and the overwhelming evidence is that the Senate should ratify the treaty. Support for the treaty should not be viewed through the lens of being liberal or conservative, Republican or…





