So if Director Pizarchik claims that those numbers were meaningless placeholders, as he has indicated before this Committee, and that they had no basis in fact, why would they need to have an all-day meeting to discuss how to change the assumption in order to lower the numbers?
Johnson challenges the rationale behind changing economic assumptions.
Share
More from Bill Johnson
That was my closing, and I yield back the balance of my time. The SPEAKER pro tempore. All time for debate on the bill has expired. Amendment No. 1 Offered by Mr. Johnson of Ohio The SPEAKER pro tempore. It is now in order to consider…
I am encouraged that the EPA decided to pull back on the eRINs program from the final set proposal...
I have tremendous respect for my colleague that just spoke, but I have to say that this idea that electric vehicles are emission-free is totally unfounded. In fact, it is totally false. All you have to do is look at where the raw materials…
Today I rise in support of H.R. 4470, and I urge all Members to support this important legislation. Keeping our American homeland secure has been a part of my life for over four decades. Though the threats to our Nation have changed since…
Other voices in this conversation
