Mr. Speaker, a congressional override of this Presidential veto is absolutely imperative to ensure the safety and viability of our Nation's water infrastructure. For the President to veto this legislation under the guise of fiscal responsibility is hypocritical at best. The tab for the President's endless war in Iraq is now in excess of $600 billion and counting. Just the interest on the amount we have borrowed to fund the war is $25 billion per year, an amount that exceeds the authorized level of this legislation. This veto is a stark reminder that the hundreds of billions of dollars spent on the war in Iraq has been at the expense of pressing priorities here at home. In the 5 years since the war began, over $45 billion has been spent on restoring the infrastructure in Iraq. This is double the $23 billion price tag a bipartisan majority of Congress seeks now to address a 7-year backlog of much-needed projects. When it comes to domestic priorities, the President has decided against investing in America.
Timothy H. Bishop: “Mr. Speaker, a congressional override of this Presidential veto is absolutely imperative to ensure the safety and…”
On the recordNovember 6, 2007
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Addressing the need for a congressional override of a presidential veto on water infrastructure funding.
Share
More from Timothy H. Bishop
Apr 23, 2013
What we are dealing with here is we are proposing a solution that not only does not solve the problem, it exacerbates the problem.
Nov 17, 2014
My fondest hope as I leave the Congress is that the way in which this committee has conducted its business will come to characterize the way the Congress as a whole conducts its business.
Mar 11, 2014
I am going to push back on that a little bit. That data, that CREDO data, if you really look at it, what it really shows is that there are either no differences or infinitesimally small differences in performance of public school students…





