Mr. Chairman, I would just briefly like to rise in support of this amendment. In fact, there is strong precedent for this type of decisionmaking to proceed now on the Federal level. I have right here a book that has been issued by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Department of Agriculture called ``Building Communities Together, Empowerment Zones and Enterprise Communities Application Guide.'' In fact, in one chapter it states under ``Overcoming Federal Barriers'' the following: A primary goal of this initiative is to review the commitment to cooperation among the Federal Government, States, and localities. To accomplish this goal we will work with all communities that have submitted a strategic plan for change, even if they do not receive Empowerment Zones or Enterprise Community designation. The strategic point of this paragraph, though, reads as follows: ``We will strive to overcome programmatic, regulatory, and statutory impediments to encourage more effective economic, human, physical, environmental, and community development activities.'' So I think the gentleman's amendment relative to the Economic Development Agency is very consistent with movements that are taking place throughout the Federal Government, and I thank the gentleman for offering this very valuable amendment to plug a hole and initiate a very important discussion on the reauthorization of the EDA.
Editor's note · Context
Supporting an amendment related to the Economic Development Agency during a committee discussion.
Share
More from Susan Molinari
You said you require more flexibility than the 2 years and you are off. Would you agree with a 3-year, or does flexibility go up to 10 years? At what point do we in society say: Flexibility, time is up, it is now up to society to expect…
Do you agree that we should establish paternity before we provide benefits? Mr. McCURDY. I do. My State, Oklahoma, has a requirement of such. When President Clinton was Governor of Arkansas, he recommended, and they established, such a…
The probability of a child growing up to be dependent on welfare is four time greater if that child comes from a welfare-dependent family. Welfare is not working. While one-half of mothers on welfare are off in 1 year, 75 percent will end…
But unfortunately we have tremendous societal needs that could truly be addressed under the Republican alternative if we created those Government-sponsored jobs that allowed women to, in fact, while their children were receiving day care…





