On the recordMay 4, 1994
No time limit? Ten, fifteen, twenty years? If they need the flexibility you are talking about, your bill gives them that flexibility.
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the flexibility of a proposed bill during a floor debate.
Share
More from Susan Molinari
May 11, 1994
Mr. Chairman, at this time I would like to join with my colleagues from the Committee on Public Works and Transportation in strongly supporting H.R. 2442. This legislation does indeed address many of the concerns expressed by the people…
May 4, 1994
Thank you, Mr. Moderator. Mr. McCurdy, do you believe in establishing time limits for individuals to get off welfare? Mr. McCURDY. I do. I support the President's proposal. There ought to be a 2-year time limit.
May 4, 1994
But, in fact, we have an alarming rate in nonwelfare society as well. And within the bill, there is nothing there to really address teenage pregnancy other than cutting off benefits. Would you not rather join a Democratic proposal to have…
May 12, 1994
Mr. Chairman, I would just briefly like to rise in support of this amendment. In fact, there is strong precedent for this type of decisionmaking to proceed now on the Federal level. I have right here a book that has been issued by the U.S…
Other voices in this conversation
