I am pleased to consider and to have taken part in the development of legislation to authorize the Human Services Act. As many of my colleagues know, and we have heard, Head Start is approaching its 30th anniversary. This program clearly has an impressive history, but is also has a whole new set of challenges for the future. One of those challenges is to address, in response to recent reports, the disparities in the quality of services provided by Head Start programs and to eliminate the fade-out effect in children once they leave Head Start. We have aggressively confronted these problems in this bill by including measures to assure greater and more consistent quality, by putting poor performance programs on notice that the status quo is over and enhancing services to help parents become full partners in the education of their children. By making a Head Start center's continued funding contingent upon quality service, this legislation will inject new levels of accountability and responsibility into this program. By providing parents with a greater voice and an enhanced role in these programs and by providing necessary family literary services and parenting skills training, this legislation truly empowers the most important people in a child's life, their parents.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Human Services Act and its impact on the Head Start program.
Share
More from Susan Molinari
Mr. Chairman, let us be clear, the war in Bosnia goes on whether we see it on the television or not. The rapes are continuing, the shelling of innocent lives goes on, and concentration camps throughout the region still have an…
Do you agree that we should establish paternity before we provide benefits? Mr. McCURDY. I do. My State, Oklahoma, has a requirement of such. When President Clinton was Governor of Arkansas, he recommended, and they established, such a…
Ms. Norton, if in fact we came up with a proposal that says we will provide education and training and day care and help you find a job, would you agree to a bill that eliminates AFDC payments after 2 years to the recipients?
There is also another question about how disingenuous the Clinton plan is, because it does, in fact, exempt over 75 percent of the participants in the program today. And it does cost $58 billion. How, in fact, does President Clinton plan…





