Let me just also add that we do, in fact, I think we agree on this, know we are going to realize immediate savings as soon as we embark on establishing paternity and making some young men in America finally pay for the responsibilities that they carelessly created. When I visited the GAIN Program, which most analysts today cite as a success story, they still indicate that 50 percent of the population that would be eligible to participate in the program is now in deferral because of problems with drugs, legal problems, teenage mothers, pregnancy or whatever. Fifty percent is not even being able to participate. What do we do for a population like that? Are we prepared then to just say they are cast aside? That is a problem for both, if we are trying to achieve some solution.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the challenges faced by participants in the GAIN Program and the need for solutions.
Share
More from Susan Molinari
There is also another question about how disingenuous the Clinton plan is, because it does, in fact, exempt over 75 percent of the participants in the program today. And it does cost $58 billion. How, in fact, does President Clinton plan…
I am pleased to consider and to have taken part in the development of legislation to authorize the Human Services Act. As many of my colleagues know, and we have heard, Head Start is approaching its 30th anniversary. This program clearly…
So you do believe we should have a standard for citizenship. You do believe we should establish and insist on paternity. You do believe we should establish time limits. Mr. McCurdy, on the basis of what we have heard tonight, you appear to…
You said you require more flexibility than the 2 years and you are off. Would you agree with a 3-year, or does flexibility go up to 10 years? At what point do we in society say: Flexibility, time is up, it is now up to society to expect…





