Because of the Court’s decision today, West Virginia, and any other state actor, can deny B. P. J. and others like her these experiences simply because it thinks they have an inherent athletic advantage, even if the facts show that they do not.
Editor's note · Context
Dissenting opinion on transgender athletes ruling.
Share
More from Sonia Sotomayor
Today, the Court discards that democratic regime in favor of one that distorts the structure of Government to fit the majority’s theory of unitary, total executive control.
if we can opt out of even 'subtle' messages, chaos will reign and student learning will suffer.
The reason the district court found intentional discrimination even after affording such deference to the Alabama Legislature is simple: The record is crystal clear.
This Court has previously recognized that immigration statutes and procedures should not be construed to ‘create a perverse incentive to enter at an unlawful rather than a lawful location. Yet, the majority’s construction does exactly that.





