To cast serious doubt on longstanding precedent is a step we historically take only with the greatest caution and reticence.
Editor's note · Context
Warns against undermining established legal precedents.
Share
More from Sonia Sotomayor
if we can opt out of even 'subtle' messages, chaos will reign and student learning will suffer.
Because of the Court’s decision today, West Virginia, and any other state actor, can deny B. P. J. and others like her these experiences simply because it thinks they have an inherent athletic advantage, even if the facts show that they do…
You want to say tariffs are not taxes, but that’s exactly what they are. They are generating money from American citizens.
This Court has previously recognized that immigration statutes and procedures should not be construed to ‘create a perverse incentive to enter at an unlawful rather than a lawful location. Yet, the majority’s construction does exactly that.





