The court should have put an end to this madness months ago before the ban first went into effect. It failed to do so then. It fails again today. The court just betrays not only the citizens of Texas but also our constitutional system of government. The court effectively invites other states to refine Texas' model for nullifying federal rights. This is a brazen challenge to our federal structure. It echoes the philosophy of John C. Calhoun, a virulent defender of the slave holding south who insisted the states had the right to veto or nullify any federal law which they disagreed.
Sonia Sotomayor: “The court should have put an end to this madness months ago before the ban first went into effect. It failed to do so…”
Editor's note · Context
Justice Sonia Sotomayor expressed her discontent with the Supreme Court's ruling on the Texas abortion ban and its implications for federal supremacy.
Share
More from Sonia Sotomayor
It hands the Executive the power to repeal statutes by firing all those necessary to carry them out.
Because the Court today errs by reducing the burden, at least in the sports context, that the Constitution places on state actors when classifying based on sex, I respectfully dissent.
Today, the Court discards that democratic regime in favor of one that distorts the structure of Government to fit the majority’s theory of unitary, total executive control.
The result is a President who emerges with far greater power than ever before. It is a power, however, that neither the People, nor Congress, nor the Constitution bestowed upon him.





