The ban is absolute, so B. P. J. cannot practice on girls’ teams, even if she would not take anyone’s spot in an eventual competition, even if everyone who tries out for the team makes it, and even if having the chance to participate could aid immensely in treating B. P. J.’s gender dysphoria.
Sonia Sotomayor: “The ban is absolute, so B. P. J. cannot practice on girls’ teams, even if she would not take anyone’s spot in an…”
On the recordJuly 1, 2026
Source
huffpost.comEditor's note · Context
Dissenting opinion on transgender athletes ruling.
Share
More from Sonia Sotomayor
Jul 1, 2026
Because of the Court’s decision today, West Virginia, and any other state actor, can deny B. P. J. and others like her these experiences simply because it thinks they have an inherent athletic advantage, even if the facts show that they do…
Jul 1, 2026
Because the Court today errs by reducing the burden, at least in the sports context, that the Constitution places on state actors when classifying based on sex, I respectfully dissent.
Jul 3, 2026
Congress passed the Refugee Act in 1980 because it did not want this country to repeat the mistakes of its past.
Jul 1, 2026
In the end, to the Court, the facts do not matter, even though the consequences are serious.





