On the recordJune 23, 2025
Apparently, the court finds the idea that thousands will suffer violence in farflung locales more palatable than the remote possibility that a district court exceeded its remedial powers.
Apparently, the court finds the idea that thousands will suffer violence in farflung locales more palatable than the remote possibility that a district court exceeded its remedial powers.
Sotomayor expressed concern over the court's decision prioritizing expediency over human rights.
Share
More from Sonia Sotomayor
The reason the district court found intentional discrimination even after affording such deference to the Alabama Legislature is simple: The record is crystal clear.
When the Executive publicly announces its intent to break the law, and then executes on that promise, it is the Judiciary's duty to check that lawlessness, not expedite it.
It also corrodes the rule of law by rewarding Alabama’s gamesmanship and outright defiance of court orders.