No, sir. Absolutely not.
Sonia Sotomayor: “No, sir. Absolutely not.”
Editor's note · Context
Sotomayor denies that personal identity should influence judicial decisions.
Share
More from Sonia Sotomayor
The majority ignores that 'arrival' and 'arriving' in the immigration context have never focused on the precise location of a noncitizen’s feet.
Today, the Court discards that democratic regime in favor of one that distorts the structure of Government to fit the majority’s theory of unitary, total executive control.
Because of the Court’s decision today, West Virginia, and any other state actor, can deny B. P. J. and others like her these experiences simply because it thinks they have an inherent athletic advantage, even if the facts show that they do…
The majority’s opinion ends by reciting the many wonderful ways in which playing sports can be valuable to young people.





