Since Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court has limited -- there`s only been limitations. No extension of any right.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg: “Since Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court has limited -- there`s only been limitations. No extension of any right.”
Editor's note · Context
Ginsburg comments on the Supreme Court's history of limiting rights since Roe v. Wade.
Share
More from Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Throwing out preclearance when it has worked and is continuing to work to stop discriminatory changes is like throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you are not getting wet.
The exception sought by Hobby Lobby and Conestoga would deny legions of women who do not hold their employees' beliefs access to contraceptive coverage.
I can't imagine what this place would be--I can't imagine what our country would be--with Donald Trump as president.
A judge sworn to decide impartially can offer no forecast, no hints, for that would show not only disregard for the specifics of the particular case, it would display disdain for the entire judicial process.





