A judge sworn to decide impartially can offer no forecast, no hints, for that would show not only disregard for the specifics of the particular case, it would display disdain for the entire judicial process.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg: “A judge sworn to decide impartially can offer no forecast, no hints, for that would show not only disregard for the…”
Editor's note · Context
Ginsburg highlighted the need for judges to maintain impartiality and avoid predicting case outcomes.
Share
More from Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Take the worst case. Suppose Roe v. Wade is overruled, who will be affected? The only women who are genuinely affected by restrictive abortion laws are poor women, a voiceless women, and as a very sorry situation.
Congressional correction of the Court's elevation of the FAA over workers' rights to act in concert is urgently in order.
Dissents speak to a future age. It's not simply to say my colleagues are wrong and I would do it this way, but the greatest dissents do become Court opinions, and gradually over time, their views sometimes become the dominant view.
Generalizations about the way women are, estimates of what is appropriate for most women, no longer justify denying opportunity to women whose talent and capacity place them outside the average description.





