In TransUnion v. Ramirez, the Supreme Court, in an act of judicial usurpation, held that the courts, rather than Congress, ought to decide which legal rights are enforceable in Federal court and which harms are concrete enough to establish Article III standing.
Ritchie Torres: “In TransUnion v. Ramirez, the Supreme Court, in an act of judicial usurpation, held that the courts, rather than…”
Editor's note · Context
Torres criticizes the Supreme Court's decision limiting Congress's role in defining legal rights.
Share
More from Ritchie Torres
Luigi Mangione is a cold-blooded assassin who belongs in prison for the rest of his life.
for more than 20 years, Chauncy Young has poured his heart into our Bronx, building bridges between education, justice, and environmental equity. He began in Highbridge, empowering neighbors through mindfulness, meditation, and self-care…
Now, more than ever, it’s important for every Democrat and every New Yorker to stand with the Governor as she fights with New York and fights against the Trump administration.
I rise today to recognize Cheryl McNear, the newly elected president of the 47th Precinct Community Council and a steadfast leader in our Bronx community. Cheryl has dedicated nearly a decade of service to the council holding multiple…





