I will tell my colleagues what is outrageous and unconscionable. It is penalizing work. It is to continue to have the Brooke amendment in place. It is to suggest that rents continue to be tied to income, whether it is 30 or 20 or 25 percent. None of us have to deal with that. None of us have to pay 20 percent of our income the day we look for an apartment. No one goes around and shops for an apartment and finds that this apartment is 25 percent of our income or this is 30 percent of our income, but that is precisely the old model that they want to go back to. That is precisely the model that has led to disastrous results. Do not ask me; go back to the housing authorities that have said this.
Rick Lazio: “I will tell my colleagues what is outrageous and unconscionable. It is penalizing work. It is to continue to have the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the Brooke amendment on housing and income.
Share
More from Rick Lazio
I hope that Donald Trump will focus on some things that are very real for American people like the fact that they have stagnant wages for almost 15 years.
Yes, I mean, so Santos is a professional con man. And now we have a con man, a true con man, sitting in Congress. And if you love the institution of Congress, you can't tolerate that.
The public has a poor view, of the ethics, of people, in Congress. And I'm pained to say that, because I think there's a lot of really honest, really good people there.
The middle class has done incredibly poorly under Barack Obama, under eight years. They don't want another eight years of going backwards in terms of their income.





