Mr. Chairman, once again we are talking about insuring that people who are working who have, possibly, disabilities, people who are seniors, Americans who are seniors, also have the ability to get choice-based vouchers. The gentlewoman said this would potentially go to people making $40,000 a year. There is not a neighborhood, an area of the country, that would be able to get vouchers under this provision at $40,000 a year. The national median is about $38,000 a year in terms of median income. We are saying at least half of those people, half of the vouchers, must go to Americans at 60 percent of that, or $22,000. If the housing authority wanted to target all of its vouchers to the people at the bottom 10 percent, they have the ability to do that. What we are saying is that we are going to allow for safety provision in respect to the concern that many have that at least half of all the vouchers must go to the bottom 60 percent of the population. It is eminently fair.
Rick Lazio: “Mr. Chairman, once again we are talking about insuring that people who are working who have, possibly, disabilities…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing housing vouchers and income eligibility during a committee meeting.
Share
More from Rick Lazio
This year is the 10th anniversary of a landmark piece of civil rights legislation--the Americans with Disabilities Act. And, it is in that spirit that I rise in support of the re-authorization of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance…
Affirm tribal self-determination by giving tribes the ability and responsibility to strategically plan their own communities' culturally-relevant development.
This is not the kind of statements that you would associate with the party of Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt or Ronald Reagan.
It is not just incumbent upon, but morally, historically, and politically imperative that Congress refrain from statutorily changing programmatic features of the Indian Housing Block Grant program.





