Mr. Chairman, we are again going around and around. We are talking about ensuring that working people have the incentive to go to work. We are trying to ensure that the Brooke amendment, which is a tax on work, which will result, even the Frank amendment will result, on more taxes on working people, on higher rents, kills jobs, hurts working poor, hurts working people, hurts mixed income, will be defeated. What we are saying is that we need to protect the most vulnerable members of our society, and that is not inconsistent. We are saying we need to protect the seniors, we need to protect the disabled, we need to protect the poorest of the poor, and all those people are protected in our manager's amendment and in our bill. We are trying to move beyond that. The gentleman has objected to a unanimous-consent request so that we can apply this to seniors in public housing, but we are going to apply this prospectively in the future to seniors using section 8 voucher-based program.
Rick Lazio: “Mr. Chairman, we are again going around and around. We are talking about ensuring that working people have the incentive…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of amendments on working people and vulnerable populations during a committee meeting.
Share
More from Rick Lazio
This year is the 10th anniversary of a landmark piece of civil rights legislation--the Americans with Disabilities Act. And, it is in that spirit that I rise in support of the re-authorization of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance…
I'm for it. I haven't done it. You've begun violating it. Why don't you stand up and do something important for America?
I think number one that, you know, Donald Trump is not going to have a hard sell to explain or to persuade the American public that Hillary Clinton is not particularly trustworthy, that she's got ethical issues.
I'm calling for just a transparency, a sense of where the money is coming from.





