I would be happy to advocate to the Committee on Appropriations for additional vouchers, choice-based vouchers. If we could find an appropriate basis to fix an authorization number, I would even be willing, in the event this amendment fails, to include that, if we could, at conference level. My position is that I do not have any basis right now in order to fix a number. I would also add that the appropriators, of course, even with an authorization, chose not to appropriate money. So there is really no reason, simply because we have a fixed number of $350 million, to presume that alone would lead the appropriators to appropriate money for that account. Because there is, of course the gentleman knows, a crisis in the project-based section 8 which needs to be resolved, and I understand that and I sympathize with the appropriators, but I am happy and pleased to advocate for additional vouchers because the need is clearly there.
Rick Lazio: “I would be happy to advocate to the Committee on Appropriations for additional vouchers, choice-based vouchers. If we…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for additional choice-based vouchers in housing appropriations.
Share
More from Rick Lazio
I think number one that, you know, Donald Trump is not going to have a hard sell to explain or to persuade the American public that Hillary Clinton is not particularly trustworthy, that she's got ethical issues.
His strength right now is his strength. It is the fact that tough talk equates for many voters to strength. And they are looking for somebody to help make them safe.
This year is the 10th anniversary of a landmark piece of civil rights legislation--the Americans with Disabilities Act. And, it is in that spirit that I rise in support of the re-authorization of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance…
I'm calling for just a transparency, a sense of where the money is coming from.





