Unless this bill passes the Congress in the context of an overall budget framework, meaning one that supports the president's plan to increase non-Defense discretionary spending, the president's senior advisors would recommend a veto.
Ryan discusses the necessity of a budget framework for passing the Military Construction Appropriations bill.
Share & report
More from Pat Ryan
Mr. Chair, I rise in opposition to this amendment. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from New York is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. Chair, there are a lot of buzz words, complicated sub- working groups and weaponization and all of this sort of language that may hide what is happening here, but I want to be crystal clear about what this amendment does. As someone…
So, more spending is not the solution to inflation because if all of those spending programs worked as well as my Democratic colleagues have claimed, well, why did we stop at $3 trillion or $4 trillion of spending?
Other voices in this conversation
