On the recordMarch 13, 2013
If the sequester were to continue, the Federal judiciary would see a reduction, as you know, of approximately $350 million.
Source
congress.govNita Lowey: “If the sequester were to continue, the Federal judiciary would see a reduction, as you know, of approximately $350…”
Editor's note · Context
Lowey discusses the impact of budget cuts on the judiciary's ability to function.
Share
More from Nita Lowey
Jul 30, 2020
Today, we continue investing for the people with H.R. 7617. This minibus combines six appropriations bills: Defense, Commerce- Justice-Science, Energy and Water Development, Financial Services and General Government, Labor-HHS-Education…
Dec 20, 2020
I want to thank my colleagues for supporting this stopgap measure to avoid a government shutdown as we finish our critical work to fund government and respond to the COVID pandemic. As my time in Congress nears a close, I must briefly…
May 15, 2020
I am delighted to yield 1 minute to the distinguished gentleman from Georgia (Mr. Bishop), chair of the Subcommittee on Agriculture.
Jul 23, 2020
I claim time in opposition to the gentleman's amendment. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from New York is recognized for 5 minutes.
Other voices in this conversation
