On the recordFebruary 24, 2015
I do not think it is good for domestic priorities. I do not think it is good for our national security priorities.
Source
congress.govI do not think it is good for domestic priorities. I do not think it is good for our national security priorities.
Lowey argues that sequestration negatively impacts both domestic and national security priorities.
Share
More from Nita Lowey
I am pleased to yield 1 minute to the gentlewoman from Washington (Ms. Schrier).
I am delighted to yield 1 minute to the distinguished gentleman from Georgia (Mr. Bishop), chair of the Subcommittee on Agriculture.
I have a motion at the desk. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Clerk will designate the motion. The text of the motion is as follows: Mrs. Lowey moves that the House concur in the Senate amendment to the title of H.R. 925 and that the House…