Political Quotes

Nita Lowey: my colleagues, we are here today, considering a ban on so-called ``partial-birth abortions'' for the eighth time in…

On the recordJuly 24, 2002
my colleagues, we are here today, considering a ban on so-called ``partial-birth abortions'' for the eighth time in seven years, because the proponents of this bill want to overturn Roe v. Wade. This ban is not about outlawing one method of abortion--it's about access to safe abortion methods used throughout pregnancy. It's not about post-viability abortion--it's about the right of all women to choose. It's about Roe v. Wade. And those who support this ban--much as I respect their convictions--do not want Americans to hear that because they know Americans support to right to choose. Roe v. Wade guaranteed that right to choose by expressing three very important values that make sense and have been widely accepted by the American people. First, the decision to terminate a pregnancy is private and personal, and should be made by a woman and her family without undue interference from the government. At the earliest point in pregnancy, the government has no place in this process. Therefore, a state cannot ban access to abortion before fetal viability, the point at which a fetus can live outside of the woman. Second, a woman must never be forced to sacrifice her life or damage her health in order to bring a pregnancy to term. The woman's life and health must come first and be protected throughout pregnancy. Third, determinations about viability and health risks must be made for each woman by her physician.
Said by
Nita Lowey
Democratic · New York

Editor's note · Context

Addressing the proposed ban on partial-birth abortions and its implications for Roe v. Wade.

Share

More from Nita Lowey

Sep 26, 2022

MEPPA offers the one thing that has always stood between proven civil society initiatives and widespread change: the promise of sufficient peacebuilding resources.

congress.gov
Oct 1, 2020

On that I demand the yeas and nays. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to section 3 of House Resolution 965, the yeas and nays are ordered. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 214, nays 207, not voting 10, as…

govinfo.gov
Jul 23, 2020

I am pleased to yield 45 seconds to the gentleman from California (Mr. Ruiz).

govinfo.gov
Sep 26, 2022

In particular, we would like to commend Congresswoman Nita Lowey, whom the bill is named after, Congressman Jeff Fortenberry, Senator Lindsey Graham, Senator Chris Coons, and Senator Tim Kaine for their leadership in advancing this…

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation