In a nation of such wealth and cultural diversity, it is a tragic commentary on our priorities that we are here today debating the elimination of the National Endowment for the Arts, an agency that spends less than 40 cents per American each year. One of the standards by which we judge a civilized society is the support it provides for the arts. In comparison to other industrialized nations, the United States falls woefully behind in this area, even with a fully funded NEA. But let us be honest, my colleagues. This is not a fight over money. The Republican leadership wants to eliminate the NEA because they are concerned about artistic expression in a free society. This battle is not about defending the values of mainstream America, this is about pandering to Pat Robertson and the Christian Coalition. The Republican assault on the arts, on cultural expression itself, is an outrage and it must be defeated.
Nita Lowey: “In a nation of such wealth and cultural diversity, it is a tragic commentary on our priorities that we are here today…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the elimination of the National Endowment for the Arts during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Nita Lowey
I am very pleased to yield 5 minutes to the distinguished gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Pallone), the chairman of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, a member of my class in the Congress.
This package of appropriations bills will help make our Nations stronger at home and respected again in the world. Together, we can bolster food security, combat climate change, protect our environment, aid the world's most vulnerable…
I urge a ``no'' vote, and I yield back the balance of my time. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to House Resolution 1067, the previous question is ordered on the amendments en bloc offered by the gentlewoman from New York (Mrs. Lowey)…
I claim time in opposition to the gentleman's amendment. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from New York is recognized for 5 minutes.





