Given the evidence that housing stability is one of the strongest indicators of retaining HIV primary care and preventing the spread of HIV, why would you reduce, rather than increase, funding for this program?
Nita Lowey: “Given the evidence that housing stability is one of the strongest indicators of retaining HIV primary care and…”
Editor's note · Context
Lowey questions funding cuts for housing programs aiding those with AIDS/HIV.
Share
More from Nita Lowey
I send to the desk a concurrent resolution and ask unanimous consent for its immediate consideration in the House. The Clerk read the title of the concurrent resolution. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the…
I urge this Subcommittee to continue its longstanding support for critical people-to-people and peacebuilding programming.
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to section 3 of House Resolution 965, the yeas and nays are ordered. Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, further proceedings on this question are postponed. Amendment No. 1…
I am very pleased to yield 5 minutes to the distinguished gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Pallone), the chairman of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, a member of my class in the Congress.





