I cannot condone the use of taxpayer dollars to defend a discriminatory law at any time.
Editor's note · Context
Lowey criticizes funding for defending the Defense of Marriage Act amidst budget cuts.
Share
More from Nita Lowey
MEPPA offers the one thing that has always stood between proven civil society initiatives and widespread change: the promise of sufficient peacebuilding resources.
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to section 3 of House Resolution 965, the yeas and nays are ordered. Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, further proceedings on this question are postponed. Amendment No. 1…
I urge this Subcommittee to continue its longstanding support for critical people-to-people and peacebuilding programming.
I have a motion at the desk. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Clerk will designate the motion. The text of the motion is as follows: Mrs. Lowey moves that the House concur in the Senate amendment to H.R. 133 with an amendment consisting of the…





