If enacted, it would not only hamstring our diplomacy, it would: substantially harm the development capabilities of USAID; recklessly undermine U.S. leadership; put our embassies and staff at risk; stymie our efforts to counter violent extremism; and fight terrorism, and harm the very people you and your agency are so dedicated to helping.
Nita Lowey: “If enacted, it would not only hamstring our diplomacy, it would: substantially harm the development capabilities of…”
Editor's note · Context
Lowey criticizes proposed budget cuts to USAID and their potential negative impacts.
Share
More from Nita Lowey
This minibus combines four bills: State and Foreign Operations; Agriculture, Rural Development, FDA; Interior, Environment; and Military Construction and Veterans Affairs. The package is the product of months of thoughtful deliberation and…
I am delighted to yield 5 minutes to the gentlewoman from California (Ms. Waters), the chair of the Committee on Financial Services.
MEPPA offers the one thing that has always stood between proven civil society initiatives and widespread change: the promise of sufficient peacebuilding resources.
It is my honor, on behalf of the New York Congressional delegation, as the co-dean along with Chairman Eliot Engel, to welcome our newest member, Chris Jacobs. Or perhaps I should say welcome him back, since Mr. Jacobs began his career…





