I strongly endorse the provision of the gentlewoman from Florida (Mrs. Meek), and I would hope that it would be in the bill. The reason the contraceptive provision is the motion to recommit is that provision did pass the House and the Senate; it was in the conference, and so it really is quite undemocratic to take it out. Last, I just want to say that I just have one brother. I have 3 children, and maybe I did not have to share everything with 11, but I have learned that democracy should work in this body, as a Member who has been here for 10 years, and I still think, in closing, it is outrageous that a provision that passed the Senate and the House and the conference should be taken out. We could have a longer debate about what should and should not be in a health benefit plan, but this has been supported by the association that represents these employees.
Nita Lowey: “I strongly endorse the provision of the gentlewoman from Florida (Mrs. Meek), and I would hope that it would be in the…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the removal of a contraceptive provision from a health benefits bill.
Share
More from Nita Lowey
Today, we continue investing for the people with H.R. 7617. This minibus combines six appropriations bills: Defense, Commerce- Justice-Science, Energy and Water Development, Financial Services and General Government, Labor-HHS-Education…
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to section 3 of House Resolution 965, the yeas and nays are ordered. Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, further proceedings on this question are postponed. Amendment No. 1…
I am pleased to yield 45 seconds to the gentleman from California (Mr. Ruiz).
Congress has the unique opportunity to support the Administration in creating a new strategy that takes a long-term approach.





