I think this is important, too, because it seems that some leaders on the other side, regardless of Chamber, have a problem not so much with the Republican Party but with members of their own party. We have heard of many Democrats joining with us in a bipartisan fashion regardless of their economic philosophy, whether they adhere to the notion of John Maynard Keynes or whether they join us in the supply-side notion that at a time of economic downturn taxes must be reduced. Why? Because the economy needs to grow and people need more of their own money to save, spend, and invest. And the American people, Mr. Speaker, have gotten wise to the tired old argument that tax relief only benefits the rich. Indeed, if you look more closely, the top 1 percent of income earners in the United States shoulder 36 percent of the tax burden. The top 5 percent take over 70 percent of the collective tax burden.
NAN A. S. HAYWORTH: “I think this is important, too, because it seems that some leaders on the other side, regardless of Chamber, have a…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing tax relief and bipartisan support for economic policies.
Share
More from NAN A. S. HAYWORTH
when your house is on fire, do you hold a hearing? When you need emergency treatment, do you take time for a hearing? I rise in support of this resolution because at times we need not be prisoners of process but instead champions of…
I come to the well again, and it seems like only yesterday we were here. In fact, it was yesterday, was it not? And, Madam Speaker, I think we have just seen why my colleague, the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. English), is one of the…
The figures we are dealing with are stunning because, to date, the GSEs have consumed approximately $150 billion from our taxpayers.
again we return to the people's House to discuss the people's business and the central question that cuts to the very core of our existence: free men and women engaged in an armed struggle to advance freedom elsewhere in the world; our…





